Maybe we're waiting for a brilliant outside-the-box discovery that would simplify all that. Do you want to find all sounds made by a talking-drum, or are you looking for sounds that resemble "Wheee-appp-dum"? Or those that sound a lot like "I'll be back"? A useful system would search from many different criteria and would automatically tag loops and samples from all these directions. But extending the concept is a big undertaking that nobody has really tackled. The supplied Apple loops derive much of their utility from having been pegged into a scheme with labels and a database to search them.
I don't have much hope for a solution until someone develops a way to group sounds that everybody will more or less subscribe too.
SAMPLISM GETTING STARTED SOFTWARE
I have the apple loops utility but I just wanted to check how others do it before I really get stuck into something only to find there's a better way I could have taken from the start.ĭo people use other software to manage their loops? Are there more intuitive ways to add samples to Apple loops? Any other tips? but even this doesn't quite break down the sheer amount there is. drum loops, drum one-shots, bass loops etc. I did begin attempting to create a folder that separated them into categories e.g. I get a bunch of new samples each month with Computer Magazine too. I would ideally love to have them all accessible via the Logic loops library under the 'My Loops' tab but it seems that going through and adding each individual sample and tagging its properties would be quite a tedious task and unfortunately sat in their folder they don't get searched through so often. Thanks again for the tip.I, as I presume most digital music creators do, have a rather large folder of samples I've collected over the years and I wanted to ask how others manage their sample collections? Mainly I’m super excited because this is a very fast and fun way of browsing samples! Total workflow revolution. Ultimately it’s not too bad since it’s so quick to export the chains of 8, then those can be merged later if longer chains are needed.Īnd it seems to be pitching every sample up by 5st once it’s loaded into a slot for some reason?
SAMPLISM GETTING STARTED MANUAL
The manual is pretty sparse!Īlso the 8 sound limitation - apparently Atlas lets you have 64 sounds loaded, but no sequencer? Could be worth a look as well. There’s currently a lot of clicking tiny buttons which is a little frustrating. I do find myself wanting more hotkey support, as well as streamlining stuff like “load the last 8 samples into the kit”. Easy to filter by folder, name, etc as well. Love how quick it is to switch them out and export, which makes it very easy to create sample chains out of sounds that would have been tucked away in folders. So I’m using the trial, it’s pretty sweet, loaded up and mapped out 24000 drum samples in a few seconds. (Trial version works for a week or something like that.)Ī xo-getting-started.pdf
SAMPLISM GETTING STARTED PDF
The quick start PDF covers the basics, a couple of days exploring the features will tell if you think it’s worth the money or not. A bit like Digitakt you have the settings for each “sound” and then you can swap out one sample, or all samples keeping the parameter settings of transient, decay, pan and effect sends etc.
Try out stuff, use the accentuator for velocity/volume curves, nudge and swing individual tracks.
Same as with finding and choosing samples goes for the built in 2 page sequncer. It’s not as “always random” as it first appears, you can do controlled tweaking in finding and replacing and trying out different combinations. XO is different, in a good way, you need to use it a while to realize how it differs and what it brings to the table. But if I’m honest, I don’t think XLN Audio are aiming at competing with Geist2, Kontakt and Maschine. You know the usual feature list with the subjective “best” parts from other software. Seen people (on other forums) say that they want more for this price, something with features from stuff like Geist2, Battery4, Maschine and what not.
0 kommentar(er)
